sudan-conflict

Nearly a thousand households in Nertiti, Central Darfur, were uprooted from their schools this year and moved to a site where the ground floods when the rains come. Their children were supposed to be learning. Instead, their classrooms were emptied so that the schools could reopen, and the families were sent somewhere else to wait.
Ask yourself what kind of state treats a school as a space to be cleared for reopening, and a displaced family as a problem to be relocated. Ask what kind of war makes that choice necessary. Sudan has been at war since April 2023, when the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces turned Khartoum into a battlefield and then pushed the fighting across the country. The UN has counted more than ten million people displaced inside Sudan and across its borders. Darfur has absorbed a disproportionate share of that suffering, as it has so many times before.
The As Salam site was established in May 2026 to house families sheltering in schools across the Nertiti locality. The Africa Center for Strategic Studies documented the first phase: 986 households moved out of 12 schools. Roughly 3,000 more households are expected in a second phase. Do the arithmetic and you find thousands of families, and their children, living in makeshift conditions for the foreseeable future. Each household is not a statistic. It is a mother who once had a kitchen and now has a mat, a father who once had work and now has a queue, and a child who once had a desk and now has dust.
The site sits about a kilometre from Nertiti town and is split into North and South blocks. Local authorities secured landowner approval for the South Block only in July 2026, which means the families were moved before the land question was settled. Reports indicate that the South Block floods in the rainy season. Think about that for a moment. A place chosen in haste, on land whose status was confirmed after people had already arrived, is now expected to shelter families through the wettest months of the year. Water rises, shelters soak, and the people who had nowhere else to go are the first to drown in the mud.
The health picture is no better. The nearest facility, Nertiti Rural Hospital, is about five kilometres away and already overstretched. Confirmed cholera cases in 2025 should have been an alarm bell that rang through every ministry and aid office in the region. Cholera does not respect camp boundaries. It travels through contaminated water, overcrowded latrines, and families who cannot afford to boil what they drink. Strengthened water, sanitation, and hygiene services, along with disease surveillance, are not luxuries. They are the difference between a manageable outbreak and a graveyard. And then there is fire. Shelters built from local materials such as Shargan mats burn fast, and when cooking fires sit beside dense rows of makeshift homes, one spark can erase a family's entire life in minutes.
We are not describing bad luck. We are describing the predictable outcome of a war that has made governance optional in Darfur. When an armed conflict shatters the state, the people who pay first are always the ones with the least power to protect themselves: women, children, the elderly, and the poor. The Sudanese people already paid a heavy price for the failure of their rulers. In 2019, millions of Sudanese took to the streets demanding civilian rule, bread, and dignity. Their revolution was hijacked by the generals who later seized power in the 2021 coup, and then by a war between rival armed men who treat civilian lives as collateral. Democracy was not defeated by the people of Sudan. It was defeated by those who refused to surrender their guns.
And we must ask who is feeding these guns. Investigators and independent observers have alleged that foreign backers, including the United Arab Emirates, have supplied weapons and funds to the Rapid Support Forces. The UAE denies these claims, and the evidence must be tested rigorously in the open. But the principle is simple and non-negotiable. A government or investor that finances a militia while children sleep on flood-prone land is not a partner in peace. It is a participant in the suffering. The same is true of anyone who sells arms to either side of this war, whether from Moscow, Tehran, Ankara, or the Gulf. African sovereignty is not protected when outside powers buy access to our ports, our gold, and our generals while our people drown in camps.
So what must happen? The solutions are not mysterious. They are the building blocks of any functioning state. First, an immediate and verifiable ceasefire, monitored by the African Union and the UN, with a clear timetable for the withdrawal of armed groups from civilian areas. Second, a binding requirement that no site for displaced people is opened without independent land verification, flood risk assessment, and a transparent consultation process recorded and published, not just "reportedly conducted." Third, emergency funding for WASH services, cholera vaccination, and fire prevention in every site, with the money tracked publicly so that donors and citizens can see where it goes. Fourth, the immediate reopening of schools in safe locations, because a generation kept out of school is a generation handed to the warlords as recruits.
Africa has proof that better governance works. Botswana built one of the continent's most stable democracies on the back of transparent institutions, prudent management of resources, and an independent judiciary that holds power to account. Mauritius shows what rule of law and open markets can do for a small island state that once had nothing but sugar. Senegal, after years of tension, completed peaceful transfers of power that proved citizens can demand change through the ballot rather than the bullet. None of these countries is perfect. All of them show that the path from chaos to dignity runs through accountable institutions, not through the guns of men who answer to no one.
The African Union must stop issuing statements and start enforcing its own principles. Its Peace and Security Council should impose targeted sanctions on commanders from both the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces who obstruct humanitarian access or target civilians, and it should bar any foreign financier of this war from AU-linked partnerships. The UN Security Council must back that enforcement with an arms embargo that is actually enforced, with inspections at borders and airports, and with public accountability for those who break it. Donor governments that lecture Africa about democracy must stop bankrolling the men who destroyed it.
And we, the citizens, must refuse to accept this as normal. Demand from your own leaders a clear position on Sudan's displaced. Ask your parliament whether your country's trade, investment, or security deals are funding the militias in Darfur. Support the civil society groups and journalists who are documenting the truth on the ground, because the war that cannot be seen is the war that gets forgotten. Pressure your governments and your companies to contribute to verified humanitarian relief rather than vanity pledges.
Nearly a thousand families were moved out of their schools and onto land that floods. Thousands more are waiting for their turn. Every one of them has a name and a future that someone is stealing. We will not look away. Those who started this war and those who profit from it must be named, sanctioned, and held to account, and the children of Nertiti must be back in their classrooms before the next rain falls.
Based on reporting by RELIEFWEB